We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.



I agree

Discrimination

Our Discrimination Team

Members of the Employment Group, at all levels of seniority, regularly represent both claimants and respondents in employment discrimination claims.

We recognise that in Employment Tribunal work, where costs are rarely recoverable, it is important to be able to offer experienced counsel at a level that is proportionate to the value of the claim.

As such, many of our junior members have significant Employment Tribunal advocacy experience, both in fighting discrimination trials and dealing with preliminary issues (such as whether a claimant is or is not disabled within the statutory definition). 

Our senior members are regularly appearing in longer or more complex discrimination Employment Tribunal trials and appeals to the EAT and the Court of Appeal.

We have considerable experience (on both sides of such litigation) in cases involving employment discrimination on the grounds of:

  • Race
  • Sex
  • Sexual orientation
  • Religion and belief
  • Disability
  • Age

We provide expertise and commercial experience at all stages of such litigation, from preliminary pre-issue advice through to mediation (including Employment Tribunal judicial mediation, which we find is increasingly appropriate in substantial discrimination claims now) and to representation at trial and on appeal.

 

GET IN TOUCH

 

Related News

Statutory directors and employment status

Statutory directors and employment status

Lucas Nacif discusses how straightforward it really is for a director to be considered an employee of the company, as well as what, if any, employment rights a director might have if they are not classed as an employee.


Published: 27th Aug 2025

EAT confirms: Failure to amend can bar subsequent tribunal claims

EAT confirms: Failure to amend can bar subsequent tribunal claims

Michael Salter discusses the case of Szucs v GreenSquareAccord Ltd [2025], in which the EAT ruled that not amending a claim to include known, related issues before the final hearing can make a later claim an abuse of process under Henderson v Henderson.


Published: 18th Aug 2025

Bailey v Aviva: Drawing the Line Between Disorder and Dismissal

Bailey v Aviva: Drawing the Line Between Disorder and Dismissal

The Employment Appeal Tribunal reminds us how tribunals should assess strike-out applications for scandalous or unreasonable conduct that does not clearly preclude a fair trial in Miss S Bailey v Aviva Employment Services Ltd [2025] EAT 109.


Published: 4th Aug 2025

LSE Legal Advice Clinic

LSE Legal Advice Clinic

The members of 42BR's Employment Team are delighted to be supporting the LSE Legal Advice Clinic, in partnership with LSE Law School & gunnercooke. 


Published: 8th Apr 2025

Does a corrected judgment ‘reset’ the appeal clock?

Does a corrected judgment ‘reset’ the appeal clock?

In Reverend J G Hargreaves v Evolve Housing + Support [2022 EAT 122], the Employment Appeal Tribunal has clarified when time for instituting an appeal starts to run if the Employment Tribunal has sent out a corrected judgment By Catherine Urquhart


Published: 15th Aug 2022

Webinar - Pleading in the Employment Tribunal

Webinar - Pleading in the Employment Tribunal

Pleadings are the first and vital step of tribunal proceedings. This webinar aims to give practical guidance as to what should be included in a well-drafted claim and response.


Published: 14th Oct 2021

2019 Annual Employment Lecture: What if ... your boss was an algorithm?

2019 Annual Employment Lecture: What if ... your boss was an algorithm?

42 Bedford Row invites you to their 2019 Annual Employment Lecture on Thursday 3rd October 2019 at 18.00pm: Followed by a drinks reception where you will get the opportunity to meet the speakers and members from our employment team. 42 Bedford Row are delighted to announce that Professor Jeremias Adams-Prassl will deliver our 2019 Annual Lecture.


Published: 10th Sep 2019

L v Q Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 1417

L v Q Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 1417

Safia Tharoo acted for Q Ltd in this case The Court of Appeal (Bean LJ and Rose LJ) has handed down its judgment in the case of L v Q Ltd, which was heard at short notice in light of the importance of the issues involved.


Published: 15th Aug 2019

McNeil v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 112

McNeil v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 112

McNeil v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 112 answers the question of whether a tribunal should approach “particular disadvantage” in equal pay and indirect discrimination cases by reference to averages or differential distribution? Differential what?! Rad Kohanzad provides a summary on McNeil v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 112


Published: 4th Jul 2019

Aston v Martlet Group

Aston v Martlet Group

Jason Braier of 42 Bedford Row highlights some gems from the Aston v Martlet Group judgment.


Published: 28th May 2019

More news

Awards & Recognition











Developed by CodeShore.Ltd