We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.



I agree

Discrimination

Our Discrimination Team

Members of the Employment Group, at all levels of seniority, regularly represent both claimants and respondents in employment discrimination claims.

We recognise that in Employment Tribunal work, where costs are rarely recoverable, it is important to be able to offer experienced counsel at a level that is proportionate to the value of the claim.

As such, many of our junior members have significant Employment Tribunal advocacy experience, both in fighting discrimination trials and dealing with preliminary issues (such as whether a claimant is or is not disabled within the statutory definition). 

Our senior members are regularly appearing in longer or more complex discrimination Employment Tribunal trials and appeals to the EAT and the Court of Appeal.

We have considerable experience (on both sides of such litigation) in cases involving employment discrimination on the grounds of:

  • Race
  • Sex
  • Sexual orientation
  • Religion and belief
  • Disability
  • Age

We provide expertise and commercial experience at all stages of such litigation, from preliminary pre-issue advice through to mediation (including Employment Tribunal judicial mediation, which we find is increasingly appropriate in substantial discrimination claims now) and to representation at trial and on appeal.

 

GET IN TOUCH

 

Related News

Statutory directors and employment status

Statutory directors and employment status

Lucas Nacif discusses how straightforward it really is for a director to be considered an employee of the company, as well as what, if any, employment rights a director might have if they are not classed as an employee.


Published: 27th Aug 2025

EAT confirms: Failure to amend can bar subsequent tribunal claims

EAT confirms: Failure to amend can bar subsequent tribunal claims

Michael Salter discusses the case of Szucs v GreenSquareAccord Ltd [2025], in which the EAT ruled that not amending a claim to include known, related issues before the final hearing can make a later claim an abuse of process under Henderson v Henderson.


Published: 18th Aug 2025

Bailey v Aviva: Drawing the Line Between Disorder and Dismissal

Bailey v Aviva: Drawing the Line Between Disorder and Dismissal

The Employment Appeal Tribunal reminds us how tribunals should assess strike-out applications for scandalous or unreasonable conduct that does not clearly preclude a fair trial in Miss S Bailey v Aviva Employment Services Ltd [2025] EAT 109.


Published: 4th Aug 2025

LSE Legal Advice Clinic

LSE Legal Advice Clinic

The members of 42BR's Employment Team are delighted to be supporting the LSE Legal Advice Clinic, in partnership with LSE Law School & gunnercooke. 


Published: 8th Apr 2025

Does a corrected judgment ‘reset’ the appeal clock?

Does a corrected judgment ‘reset’ the appeal clock?

In Reverend J G Hargreaves v Evolve Housing + Support [2022 EAT 122], the Employment Appeal Tribunal has clarified when time for instituting an appeal starts to run if the Employment Tribunal has sent out a corrected judgment By Catherine Urquhart


Published: 15th Aug 2022

Webinar - Pleading in the Employment Tribunal

Webinar - Pleading in the Employment Tribunal

Pleadings are the first and vital step of tribunal proceedings. This webinar aims to give practical guidance as to what should be included in a well-drafted claim and response.


Published: 14th Oct 2021

More news

Awards & Recognition









Developed by CodeShore.Ltd