We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.



I agree

Whistleblowing Protection

Our Whistleblowing Protection Team

Those individuals who make “Public Interest Disclosures” (or whistleblowers) perform an essential role by having the courage to speak out about misconduct, corruption and fraud.

Whistleblowing cases are often at a junction of employment law, criminal law and public policy and frequently involve a greater degree of investigation and scrutiny than other claims.

As an employee, you may not even be aware that you have “whistleblown”; you may have thought that you were raising a legitimate concern with your employer. This can come at significant personal risk; the risk of retaliation against you, leading to unexplained career detriments and the consequential financial losses.

Employers faced with an allegation of such detriment, the consequences can be significant, both financially and reputational.

Encouraging whistle-blowing helps protect society from the dangers of corruption and misconduct. If you have been retaliated against as a result of whistle-blowing, let us come to your aid.

Members of the team have appeared for both employees and major employers, private and public.

 

GET IN TOUCH

 

Related News

Permission Granted to Appeal to the Supreme Court

Permission Granted to Appeal to the Supreme Court

The Court of Appeal has granted permission for the Appellants to appeal to the Supreme Court in the case of Rice v Wicked Vision (Protect intervening) and Barton Turns Developments Ltd  v Treadwell [2025] EWCA Civ 1466.


Published: 10th Dec 2025

Statutory directors and employment status

Statutory directors and employment status

Lucas Nacif discusses how straightforward it really is for a director to be considered an employee of the company, as well as what, if any, employment rights a director might have if they are not classed as an employee.


Published: 27th Aug 2025

EAT confirms: Failure to amend can bar subsequent tribunal claims

EAT confirms: Failure to amend can bar subsequent tribunal claims

Michael Salter discusses the case of Szucs v GreenSquareAccord Ltd [2025], in which the EAT ruled that not amending a claim to include known, related issues before the final hearing can make a later claim an abuse of process under Henderson v Henderson.


Published: 18th Aug 2025

Bailey v Aviva: Drawing the Line Between Disorder and Dismissal

Bailey v Aviva: Drawing the Line Between Disorder and Dismissal

The Employment Appeal Tribunal reminds us how tribunals should assess strike-out applications for scandalous or unreasonable conduct that does not clearly preclude a fair trial in Miss S Bailey v Aviva Employment Services Ltd [2025] EAT 109.


Published: 4th Aug 2025

LSE Legal Advice Clinic

LSE Legal Advice Clinic

The members of 42BR's Employment Team are delighted to be supporting the LSE Legal Advice Clinic, in partnership with LSE Law School & gunnercooke. 


Published: 8th Apr 2025

Does a corrected judgment ‘reset’ the appeal clock?

Does a corrected judgment ‘reset’ the appeal clock?

In Reverend J G Hargreaves v Evolve Housing + Support [2022 EAT 122], the Employment Appeal Tribunal has clarified when time for instituting an appeal starts to run if the Employment Tribunal has sent out a corrected judgment By Catherine Urquhart


Published: 15th Aug 2022

Webinar - Pleading in the Employment Tribunal

Webinar - Pleading in the Employment Tribunal

Pleadings are the first and vital step of tribunal proceedings. This webinar aims to give practical guidance as to what should be included in a well-drafted claim and response.


Published: 14th Oct 2021

More news

Awards & Recognition











Developed by Algarve.PRO