
*POSTPONED* Digital Forensics in Family Law: Uncovering the Truth in the Digital Age
Join us in person or online for our latest Family Law event, exploring how digital forensics can impact family law proceedings.
Published: 6th Dec 2023
42BR Barristers understand the strain court proceedings can put on already fragile relationships, as well as individuals’ mental health. The associated costs, unpredictability and delays caused by the court system can leave clients in limbo for many months awaiting a hearing date in relation to arrangements for their children and / or finances. We believe that in many cases settling disputes before they reach the stage of court proceedings is beneficial to all clients, in particular where children are involved. This is more relevant today than ever as increasing numbers of court hearings are cancelled by the courts at very short notice, incurring significant costs for clients. Some of these cases are then given only provisional listings by the court creating further uncertainty and the prospect for clients of more wasted costs.
42BR has a dedicated group of barristers within chambers designed to provide non-court based resolutions; mediation including mediation information and assessment meetings (MIAMs), private financial dispute resolution (private FDR), early neutral evaluation (ENE), arbitration and round table meetings.
42BR’s new premises at Staple Court is specifically geared to providing the best possible venue for out-of-court settlements offering a confidential, non-adversarial, spacious and safe environment.
A private Financial Dispute Resolution (private FDR) or an Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) is an out-of-court private hearing that can take place at any time before court proceedings are started or at any stage during the court process. The private judge in the case of money and property and early neutral evaluator in children’s cases is jointly appointed by the clients. Having heard submissions from both sides the private judge or early neutral evaluator gives an indication or view as to an appropriate outcome of the issues. Whilst this indication or view is not binding, these hearings can be very effective in enabling clients reach an early resolution of issues that arise following separation or divorce. Private FDRs are used in the resolution of financial issues and ENE is used in children matters.
Private FDRs are a service provided by experienced members of our Financial Remedies team. Whilst the rate of successful settlement in court based FDRs is good, private FDRs often achieve an even better outcome for clients, without the costs and uncertainty of court proceedings. There is a popular misconception around private FDRs in that they are designed for ‘big money’ cases. This is not correct and private FDRs have proven to be of great benefit to those who have limited resources and wish to shorten litigation, ultimately reducing costs.
Clients instruct one of our Financial Remedies team of senior barristers to act as an impartial private judge. The senior barrister will read through all materials thoroughly ahead of the private FDR to familiarise themselves with the case. The private FDR will be arranged through our clerks and take place at a time and location convenient to both clients. Our new premises in Staple Inn is the perfect setting for a private FDR as it offers both privacy and comfort, with convenient transport links. Typically, a full day is set aside for the private FDR to maximise the chances of settlement. Your private judge will have no other case on that day.
The length of a private FDR can vary and solicitors may choose to represent their clients themselves, to avoid the cost of instructing counsel on each side. Private FDRs are effective before court proceedings have been issued, where both parties have made disclosure but where an agreement has not been reached. Private FDRs can also be arranged in the course of proceedings where agreed.
In children matters the private hearing takes the form of an ENE. Here a senior barrister experienced in children matters acts in the role of an early neutral evaluator. The process follows a similar process to the private FDR but is referred to as an ENE.
To summarise:
If you would like to discuss or arrange a private FDR or Early Neutral Evaluation at 42BR, please contact our ADR clerk Tim Dockrill on 020 7831 0222.
42BR barristers understand that for separating couple working out how to deal with future arrangements for your children and finances is extremely stressful and challenging. Our role as experienced family mediators is to help clients reach workable solutions away from the inevitable delay, high cost, adversarial nature and stress of court proceedings.
We have extensive experience in dealing with the issues that arise when relationships break down. Having seen families undergo the trauma of slow and expensive court proceedings, we know that mediation helps clients focus on finding constructive solutions in a timely and cost-effective manner even in the most acrimonious cases.
We mediate all aspects of arrangements for your children for example living and educational issues as well as issues around national and international relocation and your financial arrangements including pensions, inheritance and trusts. We work with clients in this country and abroad, high profile clients and high net worth matters, both on a domestic and cross-border basis.
In the majority of circumstances before an application to the court is made, either in relation to arrangements for children or financial relief, separating couples are required to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting known as a MIAM. We offer Mediation and Assessment MIAMs conducted by an accredited family mediator.
MIAMs are confidential and conducted on an individual basis. The purpose of a MIAM is to enable the full range of alternative approaches for reaching agreement on post-separation issues in relation to your finances and your children to be explained and considered. Following a MIAM the mediator will be able to confirm whether the issues you want to resolve are amenable to mediation and will let you know about the different forms of mediation that are available. These include shuttle mediation which is available where circumstances mitigate against couples being in the same room.
Mediation is a cost-effective and successful alternative to court proceedings, operating in a professional, rigorous and confidential environment away from the adversarial nature of court. Mediation can help significantly in reducing the conflict too frequently associated with concluding the legal and practical issues involved in separation, even in the most complex and acrimonious circumstances.
Mediation is confidential. The mediator is a neutral third person who is trained and an expert in their area. The mediator helps you to identify the issues you want to resolve; explore possible options and then reach joint agreements. As mediators we are completely impartial, we will help you to communicate and ensure that the process is balanced and that neither person is at a disadvantage in the mediation. Mediators manage the process but the agenda is established and agreements reached by clients.
In general, legal representatives are welcome to attend mediations and clients have free access to consult their legal representatives at any time during the mediation. If communications are particularly strained or acrimonious, shuttle mediation where clients are in separate rooms is available
Chambers are able to facilitate MIAMs and mediations in the professional and support environment of our chambers in person or online. Mediation sessions are usually about two hours long. More than one session may be needed to resolve the issues to be resolved, dependent on their complexity. Generally, three or four sessions are required, particularly where there are complex financial matters such as those which involve an independent pension advisor or tax expert. Our mediation sessions are designed to accommodate our clients and some matters can be resolved in a morning or full day session.
If you are considering mediation or would like to know more about mediation or MIAMs we believe it is very important that you have an opportunity to speak directly to one of our mediators. As a first step, please contact our ADR clerk Tim Dockrill on 020 7831 0222.
Arbitration is another cost effective, out-of-court offering from the 42BR barristers. Arbitration can be used to resolve financial disputes and disputes involving children. It can take place before proceedings are issued or at any stage with the court’s approval during proceedings. The key difference between arbitration and other alternative dispute resolutions is the arbitrator you appoint will make the decision and this is a binding decision. Arbitration is not just for married couples or those in a civil partnership, it can be used for unmarried couples also and can help resolve a wide range of disputes following the breakdown of a relationship.
Arbitration is similar to the court process in that the arbitrator will hear each client’s case and consider the evidence. Having done so the arbitrator, who is jointly appointed by the clients, will make a decision and give either an award if the matter is dealing with financial arrangements or a determination in children’s cases. This decision is binding on both clients who then in financial cases agree a consent order to send to the court for approval in the terms of the award. This is subject to an appeal to a court which is based on the same approach as if a judge had made the decision at a final hearing sitting in court.
Arbitration and mediation sometimes work together or in parallel. A family arbitrator may consider mediation would benefit a couple and may suggest this. Sometimes in mediation where one of the issues to resolve is proving difficult to settle, mediators may recommend family arbitration to determine that single issue before returning to mediation.
Arbitrators are senior barristers with extensive experience who will be a member of the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators. Arbitration is much quicker than court proceedings. You can fix a date for your arbitration almost immediately after you and your former partner have chosen the arbitrator. The arbitration can be arranged at a time, date and venue convenient for both parties; our new premises at Staple Inn are particularly suited to conducting an arbitration.
If you would like to discuss or arrange an arbitration at 42BR, please contact our ADR clerk Tim Dockrill on 020 7831 0222.
42BR barristers have substantial experience in the conduct of roundtable meetings and our newly renovated premises at Staple Inn provides bespoke facilities that suit the three-room format of a round table meeting.
The format of roundtable meetings usually involves three rooms: a dedicated room for each party to have private discussions with their legal representatives and a third room in which both sides meet to negotiate. At 42BR we have bespoke rooms available for three-room meetings where both sides may discuss their case in privacy, comfort and safety and then negotiate in a third room, either face-to-face or through their chosen representatives as chosen by the parties.
If you would like to discuss or arrange a round table meeting at 42BR, please contact our ADR clerk Tim Dockrill on 020 7831 0222.
Join us in person or online for our latest Family Law event, exploring how digital forensics can impact family law proceedings.
Published: 6th Dec 2023
The third instalment of our Autumn to Winter Family Law Webinar Series, presented by Samuel Davis and Eleonore Berthelsen.
Published: 23rd Nov 2023
The second session in our Autumn/Winter Family Law Webinar Series, presented by Hazel Samuriwo and Charmaine Clubb.
Published: 20th Nov 2023
Celeste Irvine and Helen Nettleship discuss Nuffield FJO's welcome briefing “Children subject to deprivation of liberty (DoL) orders” which reflects the 12 months pilot phase of the national DoL court.
Published: 20th Sep 2023
Kicking off our Family Law Autumn to Winter webinar series, Rachel Chan and Charlotte Mackenzie discuss witness statements in family law proceedings.
Published: 8th Sep 2023
Our latest Family Law Webinar Series, spanning the Autumnal and Winter months, covering private, public and financial remedies proceedings.
Published: 9th Aug 2023
Acting for the Mother in the Court of Appeal case, RE T and others (Children) (Adequacy of reasons)
Published: 4th Jul 2023
Our annual Brighton Party is back, not long to go now!
Published: 26th Jun 2023
James Sharpe and Helen Nettleship provide their tips on drafting a compliant threshold document.
Published: 23rd Jun 2023
Jennifer Youngs and Charmaine Clubb present the third installment of our Junior Family Law Webinar Series.
Published: 16th Jun 2023
Eléonore and Samuel present the second of junior family law webinar series.
Published: 9th Jun 2023
The Court of Appeal clarified the legal test for an appeal against a contempt of court sentence in a family case. Arfan Khan acted for the Appellant.
Published: 22nd May 2023
The first of our Junior Family Law webinar series, presented by Hannah Cox and Catrin Howells.
Published: 19th May 2023
Congratulations to Richard Little who has today been appointed Recordership
Published: 18th May 2023
Our junior members are pleased to present a series of four webinars, aimed at junior solicitors, covering different areas of family law.
Published: 18th May 2023
Amanda Jepson and Mark Chaloner present a Public Law Update.
Published: 12th May 2023
Recording of our Language Matters webinar considering the role of practitioners in shaping the experience of families through our use of language.
Published: 27th Apr 2023
42BR's Family Group invite you to our annual Brighton Party.
Published: 24th Apr 2023
A Family Law webinar, presented by Hannah Cox of 42BR and Helen Adam, mediator and chair of the Family Solutions Group, considering the role of practitioners in shaping the experience of families through our use of language.
Published: 20th Apr 2023
Amanda Jepson provides a brief case summary of the case, M (A Child: Leave To Oppose Adoption) [2023] EWCA Civ 404 (18 April 2023)
Published: 20th Apr 2023
Damian Woodward-Carlton KC and Sharan Bhachu explore the problem of memory in family fact finding hearings.
Published: 19th Apr 2023
42BR member, Sharan Bhachu, has published a book on factitious illness. Available to purchase now.
Published: 18th Apr 2023
Jennifer Youngs provides a case summary for the case of C, D and E (Care Proceedings: Adequacy of Reasons) [2023] EWCA Civ 334
Published: 11th Apr 2023
Tina Cook KC and Zoe McGrath present the second instalment of our Family Law Webinar series.
Published: 20th Mar 2023
Richard Little represented E, a respondent mother in H v E [2023] EWHC 381 (Fam)
Published: 17th Mar 2023
Siân Smith provides a financial remedies update for the first webinar in our Family Law Series 2023.
Published: 24th Feb 2023
Our Family Group is delighted to present our Spring/Summer webinar programme, covering financial remedies, private and public law.
Published: 20th Feb 2023
Join us Friday 3 March in Canterbury for a night of quizzing.
Published: 1st Feb 2023
Tina Cook KC acted for W, a 13 year old who suffers from multi-system problems arising from a rare gene mutation in Lancashire County Council v M & Ors [2022] EWHC 2900 (Fam)
Published: 7th Dec 2022
42BR's Family Group is pleased to present a webinar series, comprising of three sessions, in which they will explore different elements of financial remedies cases.
Published: 1st Dec 2022
We won two awards at this years Family Law Awards
Published: 29th Nov 2022
The Judgment, involving the LIFT service at the East London Family, is important and highlights why the expert assessment fell short of what is expected in family proceedings.
Published: 12th Oct 2022
We are delighted to have been shortlisted in this years Family Law Awards
Published: 5th Sep 2022
“Achieving transparency in Family justice: what further steps are appropriate or necessary?”
Published: 5th Sep 2022
Damian Woodward-Carlton QC has written an article which has been published in LexisNexis Family Law.
Published: 15th Jul 2022
Gemma Farrington QC and Marcia Hyde appeared on behalf of the father in the Court of Appeal
Published: 14th Jul 2022
Following on from the recent Supreme Court judgment in H-W [2022] UKSC 17 ...
Published: 30th Jun 2022
Damian Woodward-Carlton QC, Sharan Bhachu and Katie Phillips appeared for the respondent Local Authority at Supreme Court level, in the matter of H-W.
Published: 15th Jun 2022
Family Webinar discussing how the family pet can be used to control and coerce and thereby provide evidence of domestic abuse.
Published: 19th May 2022
Published: 10th May 2022
Published: 5th May 2022
Damian Woodward-Carlton QC, Jennifer Youngs and Katherine Archer are published in the March 2022 edition of Family Law Journal
Published: 19th Apr 2022
Join us for a free, in-person seminar with Gemma Farrington, Alison Pryor & Diane Robson.
Published: 23rd Mar 2022
Find out more about CUBAS parenting assessments that are taking the family courts by storm.
Published: 7th Mar 2022
Tina Cook QC & Charmaine Clubb will be providing free virtual training in the form of a Family Law Webinar.
Published: 17th Feb 2022
42 Bedford Row is delighted that the Queen has appointed Caroline Landes to be a District Judge
Published: 23rd Dec 2021
Gemma Taylor QC and Jeremy Hall represented the father and children respectively in the recently reported High Court decision
Published: 30th Nov 2021
This case concerned a toddler who sadly passed away from natural causes but as is usual underwent a skeletal survey following his death.
Published: 13th Sep 2021
Published: 5th Jul 2021
Jeremy presents a round-up of recent decisions and changes.
Published: 9th Jun 2021
The Court of Appeal has found that a trial judge had misapplied Lucas in finding that a juvenile’s consciousness of guilt that he had sexually abused another child was the only reasonable explanation for his lies at trial.
Published: 12th Apr 2021
Published: 11th Mar 2021
Gemma Farrington and Alison Pryor have written an article which has been published by Lexis Nexis Family Law.
Published: 1st Mar 2021
Published: 23rd Jun 2020
Published: 23rd Jun 2020
Published: 3rd Jun 2020
Published: 1st Jun 2020
Published: 21st May 2020
Published: 11th May 2020
Published: 6th Feb 2020
Published: 5th Nov 2019
Published: 18th Oct 2019
Published: 9th Sep 2019
Damian Woodward- Carlton QC has contributed to the Counsel Magazine in an article discussing pupillage mistakes.
Published: 3rd Sep 2019
Chambers is delighted to welcome Caroline Landes as a new member of our Family Law team.
Published: 27th Aug 2019
Jane Hayford instructed for the Respondent mother. Appeal by intervenor against findings of fact made in care proceedings. Appeal allowed.
Published: 31st Jul 2019
Damian Woodward- Carlton QC has contributed to the Family Law Journal July edition, discussing Radicalisation and the Family Court.
Published: 23rd Jul 2019
Monica Ford was instructed on the appeal. Monica was instructed for the Respondent Children through their Guardian.
Published: 9th Jul 2019
6.00pm, Tuesday 2nd July
Published: 19th Jun 2019
Published: 10th Jun 2019
Volunteers' Week
Published: 6th Jun 2019
Philip McCormack instructed for the Third Respondent acting by his Guardian.
Published: 20th May 2019
Tina Cook QC and Gemma Taylor QC were instructed in the recently reported decision of Lancashire County Council v TP & Ors (Permission to Withdraw Care Proceedings) [2019] EWFC 30 (09 May 2019)
Published: 13th May 2019
6.00pm - Thursday 23rd May
Published: 2nd May 2019
Thanks to the generosity of everyone, we raised an outstanding £1,309.65 which will go some way to help children in desperate need for a respite break.
Published: 27th Mar 2019
Published: 19th Mar 2019
Damian Woodward-Carlton QC acted for the mother in Re Q (Child: Interim Care Order: Jurisdiction)
Published: 14th Mar 2019
Legal 500 UK Awards
Published: 6th Dec 2018
Philip McCormack instructed on behalf of the children’s guardian
Published: 17th Nov 2018
Read Z v Kent County Council (Revocation of placement order – Failure to assess Mother’s capacity and Grandparents) [2018] EWFC B65 (18 October 2018).
Published: 7th Nov 2018
Chambers are thrilled to have 13 individual recommendations/rankings in the new Legal 500 guide.
Published: 30th Oct 2018
Read re T [2018] EWCA Civ 1236 on deprivation of children’s liberty & the inherent jurisdiction.
Published: 16th Oct 2018
Tina Cook QC for the respondent father has successfully sought the dismissal of an appeal in the above case.
Published: 15th Oct 2018
42 Bedford Row are delighted to announce Mary Robertson has been appointed as one of the Counsel to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse as part of the team undertaking the inquiry into Residential Schools.
Published: 27th Sep 2018
Tina Cook QC will be speaking at the Public Children Law Conference on Tuesday 2nd October 2018 at The Caledonian Club. Tina Cook QC will be speaking on Fact finding hearings.
Published: 26th Sep 2018
In this case she acted for the mother. Knowles J provides detailed recommendations about the management of police disclosure in care proceedings.
Published: 9th Aug 2018
Gemma Taylor QC acted for the mother.
Published: 1st Aug 2018
Gemma Taylor QC for the children’s guardian, Francis Cassidy for the 3rd Respondent and Robert Cameron for the Applicant.
Published: 1st Aug 2018
Appeal concerning the powers of the court to make an order for assessment of a child under section 38(6) of the Children Act 1989.
Published: 14th May 2018
Sharan Bhachu and Sian Gough are joining a panel discussion on children law at the Bloomsbury Professional Family Law Conference on the 16th May, at Gray’s Inn.
Published: 18th Apr 2018
A case where the local authority applied to remove Father as a party to proceedings and from local authority decision making about the welfare of his children.
Published: 19th Mar 2018
As part of her ongoing training of professionals who work with parents with learning disabilities, Gemma Taylor has contributed to a new resource for independent advocates working with parents with learning disabilities.
Published: 18th Jan 2018
42 Bedford Row is delighted to announce that Gemma Taylor has been appointed Queen’s Counsel in the 2017 competition.
Published: 20th Dec 2017
Jermey Rosenblatt has contributed to the December edition of the International Bar Association Legal Practice Division. Topics include: Poland: a Supreme Court and Gay lawyers.
Published: 20th Dec 2017
19 and 21-year old son and daughter of a homeless applicant are not ‘dependent children’ for the purposes of assessing ‘priority need’ Introduction Stefan Liberadzki recently appeared for a local authority in a homelessness appeal under s.204 of the Housing Act 1996. Here he discusses the Court’s decision that the appellant’s children could not count
Published: 5th Jul 2017
Tina Cook QC, Damian Woodward-Carlton and Fareha Choudhury appeared in this re-hearing of a fact finding. A mother found to have inflicted near-fatal injuries to the spine and skull of her infant son, successfully applied to re-hear the findings of fact. Newly-obtained medical evidence of the child’s spinal osteopenia led the Court to replace its
Published: 12th Jan 2017
A new and concerning attitude of the High Court to urgent ex parte applications in Hague cases when the first process is commenced: solicitors and advocates must take notice. Read the articles written for the International Bar Association here and here
Published: 12th Oct 2016
After the almost unbearable tension of the criminal hearing to determine whether or not Helen would be found guilty of stabbing Rob, last week saw the family court hearing to determine the living and contact arrangements for Henry and Jack. Four members of the chambers’ family team, who are all addicted to the Archers, have
Published: 19th Sep 2016
Francesca Conn secured Human Rights Acts damages of £15,000 for a child and £6,000 for the parent following care proceedings. The local authority was found to have treated her client, the disabled parent, in a hostile and judgmental manner and to have failed to have due regard to its Equality Act 2010 obligations towards him,
Published: 9th Sep 2016
Seminar on parents with learning disabilities given on 10th March. Gemma Taylor (barrister 42 Bedford Row) outlined the duties of Local Authorities to parents with learning disabilities and the recent case law. Rachel Butt (Senior Advocate, Impetus) explained how parents actually experience court proceedings and what steps could be taken to improve outcomes. Please find
Published: 14th Mar 2016
Awards & Recognition