We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

Our strength
is in our groups

Areas of Expertise

View Full Profile

Stefan Liberadzki

Call 2013
Telephone 020 7831 0222
Email stefanl@42br.com


Profile Privacy Notice vCard

Stefan Liberadzki - 42 Bedford Row


Stefan has a well-established practice in employment, housing and landlord & tenant law. His clients range from individuals to local authorities and multinational businesses. Stefan offers straightforward and practical advice, and a thorough and measured approach to litigation.

Solicitors have described Stefan’s preparation and delivery at court as “excellent” and commented that he “is extremely personable and manages to put the client at ease.” Feedback from lay clients includes: “Within my twenty years of dealing with a variety of lawyers, very few have come across the way that Stefan presents himself and his client, putting their interests and welfare first”.

Stefan has been a member of 42 Bedford Row, where he undertook pupillage, since 2014.  Before coming to the Bar he worked in the Property, Family & Trusts team at the Law Commission and as a visiting tutor in Property Law at King’s College London. He is a co-author of Daniel Barnett’s Employment Law Handbook (8th edition, 2020).


Education and Awards

  • Bar Professional Training Course – Kaplan Law School – Very Competent (2013)
  • Queen Mother Scholarship – Middle Temple (2011)
  • BA in Law – University of Cambridge (2010)
  • Senior Harris Scholarship – Downing College, Cambridge (2010)

News & Events

News & events

Stefan Liberadzki represents Employment Tribunal claimant who successfully establishes “employee” status for claim under the Equality Act

In EP v The Gym Ltd, the Claimant (referred to here as ‘EP’) was engaged by a nationwide chain of low-cost 24-hour gyms as a “freelance personal trainer”. His claim for disability discrimination arises from the Respondent’s termination of his contract on the grounds of absence from work, which he says was caused by a medical condition amounting to a disability.

4th January 2018 Read more