We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.



I agree

Stephen Willmer - 42BR Barristers

Stephen Willmer

Call 2004
Telephone 020 7831 0222 | Email [email protected]

Profile Privacy Notice vCard

Stephen Willmer

Call 2004
Telephone 020 7831 0222 | Email [email protected]

Profile Privacy Notice vCard

Stephen Willmer accepts instructions across the gamut (see below) of chancery and commercial practice in England and Wales. There is in his practice an emphasis on disputes concerning houses, albeit the disputes arise for different reasons, personal and professional, and may be couched in different terms.

Stephen likes to think that his advice is practical and that his representation in court is firm.  He is always keen to get under the skin of a problem and to consider it from all angles.

His practice is focused on London and the South East, but he travels all over the country as required.

Business Law

Stephen’s work in business law centres on insolvency, shareholder and (quasi-) partnership disputes, usually in privately owned businesses, often at the somewhat grey crossing point between personal relationships and un- or semi-documented agreements and frequently where there is more than a hint of deceit in a disintegrating business relationship.

Accordingly, he advises and appears in unfair prejudice and winding-up petitions, derivative actions and those more nebulous actions involving breaches of contract and of trust.

RECENT CASES:

  • Advice and representation in a case concerning section 125 of the Companies Act and which focused on residential property development.
  • Representation and drafting in an arbitration for a contract case involving provision of very bespoke and expensive joinery.
  • Advising in an asset purchase agreement concerning a boutique London company.
  • A winding-up petition contested on the basis that it arises from a fraud where the background concerns a multi-party commercial house building agreement.
  • Advising an angel investor where his investment had been abused and, on a separate occasion, advising the company owner accused of similar misconduct.
  • Successful representation at trial of a husband and wife ‘bilked’ over many years by a business associate in relation to real estate developments.
  • Advice and representation for multiple former company directors accused of executing preferential transactions/transactions at an undervalue.
  • Representation in an application to rescind a winding-up order.
  • Advice and representation in multiple applications to restrain presentation of winding-up petitions.
  • Advice and representation in multiple different business breakdowns, where the underlying business was both documented and undocumented, and up to and including the use of freezing orders.
  • Advice and representation in multiple cases of (usually) domestic construction firms claimed against by owners for work done (or not done), and also as between contractors.
  • See also:  Khan -v- Khan – a case on undocumented partnerships, constructive trusts and fiduciary duties.

Property Law

In the field of property law, Stephen’s instructions tend to fall into three categories, with some occasional overlap between them.

The first category centres on the 1975 Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependants) Act, contentious probate claims, claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (ToLATA) and breach of trust/proprietary estoppel claims.  As indicated above, these disputes overwhelmingly involve houses (although this is sometimes true of his business law practice as well).

The second category comprises commercial and domestic landlord and tenant disputes, leasehold disputes and mortgagees’s possession claims.

The third category arises out of disagreements between neighbours which usually arise over a boundary and develop into complaints of harassment (and sometimes more sinister behaviour).

RECENT CASES: 

  • Advice and representation in a case involving the now distant and concluded administration of an estate bitterly fought over by siblings.
  • Overlapping with his Business practice, Stephen has recently advised and represented in case involving assignments of commercial leases.  The most recent involved a claim for damages exceeding £300,000.
  • Advising on the correct interpretation of two different commercial leases.
  • Advice in a highly unusual case involving the beneficiaries of the unadministered estate of a man who died in the mid-1990s.
  • Tribunal representation in a case surrounding the true construction of an agricultural conveyance.
  • Advice and representation in a trespass case involving encroachment on ancient woodland owned by a community benefit society.
  • Advice and representation in a case involving an alleged breach of covenant as between residential lessees, with attendant allegations of harassment.
  • Advice for the personal representative of an English estate on the correct approach to a US beneficiary who lacked capacity.
  • Representation in a bankruptcy case which morphed into an investigation of elderly family real estate dealings in order to establish whether equally ancient property transactions had been a ‘rainy day’ sham.
  • Advice and drafting in multiple cases involving local authority attempts to claw back care home fees from deceased residents and their personal representatives.
  • Multiple instructions over many years in 1975 Act cases, for both parties, and likewise with contentious probate claims (and applications regarding personal representatives).  In all cases, early advice is recommended.
  • Stephen is currently instructed to advise and represent in numerous ToLATA cases involving a variety of settings from the familial to the commercial and, in at least three cases, a crossover between the two settings.  Most recently this has involved advice in two disintegrated male/female relationships.  
  • Advice and representation in possession claims of all kinds, too many cases to mention.  One recent case of note involved a complex counterclaim and receivers.  Another involved a Sikh temple.
  • One recent leaseholder dispute of particular interest involved an unfair prejudice petition against a property management company.
  • Representation in four neighbour boundary disputes on the periphery of London and in the shires, two of which involve easements.  Another recent case of note involved a sizeable strip of land in the shires and the interpretation of a deed limiting its use.
  • See also: Re. Hendry – a case on the 1975 Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependants) Act, with a focus on claims being out-of-time (i.e. late).

Public Access

Stephen Willmer has been public access qualified for the best part of 15 years and, where appropriate, has handled hundreds of cases on this basis. 

Areas of Expertise

Related News

Awards & Recognition











Developed by CodeShore.Ltd