Arfan Khan successful in appeal against strike out order under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Arfan Khan represented the successful Appellant on appeal, instructed by Chipatiso Associates LLP at short notice, having not appeared at first instance. HHJ Shanks granted an oral hearing on the grounds of appeal, which were prepared by the previous advocate.
The appeal challenged the Employment Tribunal's decision to strike out claims of race discrimination, sex discrimination, victimisation, and harassment. The Employment Tribunal had dismissed these claims under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 ("the ET Rules"), concluding that the Appellant's former representative's conduct was scandalous, vexatious, or unreasonable. The Employment Tribunal found that the former representative treated the case as a personal crusade, failed to act in the Appellant's best interest, and pursued his own agenda against the Respondent.
In an extempore judgment, the Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the appeal and provided guidance on the interpretation and application of Rule 37 of the ET Rules 2013. The EAT remitted the case back to the Employment Tribunal before a different judge.
17th Jul 2024
42BR's Civil Fraud Webinar Series 2024 - 2025
Register here for our Civil Fraud Webinars, taking place from October 2024 to February 2025. Read more >
Adverse possession- a review of the principles and recent cases
Register now for our upcoming Business & Property webinar, hosted by Edmund Walters and Stephen Willmer. Read more >