We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.



I agree

Environmental

Our Environmental Law Team

Well-known for high profile environmental cases, the team represents both sides in civil court proceedings. Our barristers also appear in Magistrates’ Court prosecutions for statutory nuisance under Part III of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

Our barristers are renowned for their technical and legal knowledge in this complex field and act in fields including:

  • Water law
  • Pollution
  • Drainage
  • Nuisance
  • Trespass
  • Rylands vs Fletcher
  • Riparian rights
  • Waste

 

GET IN TOUCH

 

Related News

Can you trust a notice to quit?

Can you trust a notice to quit?

Michael Grant discusses the recent High Court decision in Procter v Procter and others [2022] EWHC 1202.


Published: 30th May 2022

‘Fitness for Human Habitation’ Day

‘Fitness for Human Habitation’ Day

Today, 20 March 2019, the Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018 comes into force; introducing new sections 9A, 9B and 9C into the 1985 Act.


Published: 20th Mar 2019

Double-edged sword: Can you have two possession orders at once?

Double-edged sword: Can you have two possession orders at once?

Double-edged sword: Can you have two possession orders at once? In a recent case an interesting point arose around whether or not it was possible for a landlord under an AST to have two possession orders in respect of the same property at the same time. Facts The facts of the case were fairly typical.


Published: 13th Mar 2017

Housing Bulletin No 19 – New evidence, settled section 204 appeals and cost

Housing Bulletin No 19 – New evidence, settled section 204 appeals and cost

Welcome to this, the 19th bulletin from the Housing Team. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com New evidence, settled section 204 appeals and costs LB Croydon v. Lopes [2017] EWHC 33 (QB) It is well known that usually


Published: 1st Feb 2017

Housing Bulletin No 18 – Forfeiture for non-payment of service charges

Housing Bulletin No 18 – Forfeiture for non-payment of service charges

Welcome to this, the 18th bulletin from the Housing Team. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com Forfeiture for non-payment of service charges Last month, we ran a workshop in Chambers exploring the law and procedure of forfeiting a


Published: 9th Jan 2017

Housing Bulletin No 17 – Anti-social behaviour injunctions

Housing Bulletin No 17 – Anti-social behaviour injunctions

Welcome to this, the 17th bulletin from the Housing Team. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com Anti-social behaviour injunctions: can the Court rely on historic bad behaviour? Birmingham City Council v Glenn Parode [2016] EWHC 3119 (QB) In


Published: 14th Dec 2016

Housing Bulletin No 16 – Warrants for Possession

Housing Bulletin No 16 – Warrants for Possession

Welcome to this, the sixteenth bulletin from the Housing Team. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com Warrants for Possession Cardiff City Council v Lee (Flowers) [2016] EWCA Civ 1034 The Senior Master has today issued her practice note


Published: 22nd Nov 2016

Housing Bulletin No 13 – Human Rights and the Private Sector

Housing Bulletin No 13 – Human Rights and the Private Sector

Welcome to this, the thirteenth bulletin from the Housing Team. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com This bulletin discusses the judgment in the case of McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & others [2016] UKSC 28.


Published: 20th Jun 2016

Housing Law Bulletin No 12 – updating service of 2015 on all issues relating to housing law

Housing Law Bulletin No 12 – updating service of 2015 on all issues relating to housing law

Welcome to this, our twelfth updating service of 2015 on all issues relating to housing law — whether social or private, landlord or tenant. Here, Niamh O’Brien offers a case law update : Mansing Moorjani v Durban Estates Limited [2015] EWCA Civ 1252 An unusual set of facts permits the Court of Appeal to review the legal basis for damages to be awarded for disrepair to premises let on a long lease.


Published: 22nd Dec 2015

Housing Law Bulletin No 5

Housing Law Bulletin No 5

Topic: “How should the courts assess whether a homeless applicant is vulnerable and in priority need of housing, with reference to the Housing Act 1996 s.189 (1)(c)?”


Published: 2nd Jul 2015

Housing Law Bulletin No 4

Housing Law Bulletin No 4

Topic: Changes to the tenancy deposit protection rules. On 26 March 2015, sections 30 to 32 of the Deregulation Act 2015 came in to force. What are the implications of this for landlords in relation to tenancy deposit schemes?


Published: 2nd Jul 2015

Housing Law Bulletin No 2

Housing Law Bulletin No 2

Welcome to this, the second bulletin from the Housing Team. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com. Topic: Akerman- Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd “Can the court summarily dispose of a defence to possession based on an allegation of unlawful


Published: 31st Mar 2015

Housing Law Bulletin No 1

Housing Law Bulletin No 1

Welcome to this, the first bulletin of what will be a regular updating service on all issues relating to housing law — whether social or private, landlord or tenant. We hope that you will find the content of interest: if you wish to receive further updates you can subscribe by replying to housing@42br.com “Can a


Published: 4th Mar 2015

Dispensing with the need to consult about service charges – at what cost?

Dispensing with the need to consult about service charges – at what cost?

The Supreme Court has changed the law about dispensing with the need for consultation for qualifying works or qualifying long term agreements where tenants of residential dwellings have to pay service charges: Daejan v Benson [2013] UKSC 14. The requirements for consultation in the 2003 Regulations (2003 SI 1987) are complex and lengthy. They vary according to


Published: 8th Mar 2013

More news

Awards & Recognition











Developed by CodeShore.Ltd