We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.
By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.
By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
...that a notice of claim seeking an extended Lease under section 42 of the Leasehold Reform and Urban Development Act 1993 (“the notice”) was invalid. The notice was invalid as it was not signed by the tenant’s solicitors in accordance with section 44 of the Companies Act 2006 (as applied to limited liability partnerships): Alco Realty v Davis Claim No.E03CL546 (January 2020). For more details please contact Howard Lederman: (HowardL@42br.com)
Howard Lederman’s profile can be viewed here
02.04.2020
Employment Law Barrister Safia Tharoo shares her thoughts on Ramadhan in the workplace. Read more >
Michael Salter presents a webinar looking at Witness Statements for Employment Tribunal Cases. Read more >
