We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.
By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.
By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Julie Stather examines the recent use of section 20 and considers its future in the light of the impending 26 week limit for care proceedings.
“Section 20(1) has long been the section of the Children Act 1989 most likely to give rise to differences of opinion. Give a room full of lawyers a set of pertinent facts to work from and half of them would advise the parents to agree to s20 accommodation and the other half would advise them to fight it tooth and nail. This article examines the recent use of s20(1)(c) and the efforts of the judiciary to give guidance about that use, and considers what the future may hold in the increasingly tightly regulated world of care proceedings.”
21.10.2014
The case considered the provision of toileting facilities and whether female staff were treated less favourably than male staff when using the same facilities Read more >
Does the Court of Appeal decision in Kong v Gulf International Bank UK Limited dilute the protection for whistleblowers? Read more >
