We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.



I agree

Philip Newman represented the applicant.

Summary: Where a defendant had filed an acknowledgement of service but had not disputed the court’s jurisdiction within 14 days after filing it, as required by CPR r.11(4), he was not entitled to extra time to serve notice to dispute jurisdiction even though the claimant’s claim form had been served on the defendant outside the jurisdiction after the six-month period required for service. Rule 11(5) had been engaged and the defendant was treated as having accepted the court’s jurisdiction. Link: Case Analysis (pdf)


10th Jul 2014

Family Law Webinars - January to July 2026

Register now for our upcoming private, public and financial remedies webinars, taking place between January and July 2026. Read more >

Will Foulkes joins 42BR Barristers as our newest tenant

We are delighted to share that Will Foulkes has joined 42BR as our newest tenant. Read more >

GET IN TOUCH

 

 

Social media:

    

Awards & Recognition











Developed by Algarve.PRO