Philip Newman represented the applicant.
Summary: Where a defendant had filed an acknowledgement of service but had not disputed the court’s jurisdiction within 14 days after filing it, as required by CPR r.11(4), he was not entitled to extra time to serve notice to dispute jurisdiction even though the claimant’s claim form had been served on the defendant outside the jurisdiction after the six-month period required for service. Rule 11(5) had been engaged and the defendant was treated as having accepted the court’s jurisdiction. Link: Case Analysis (pdf)
10th Jul 2014

42BR Barristers - Headline Sponsor of the Family Law Awards 2026
We are delighted to be sponsoring the awards for another year! Read more >

Family Law Webinars - January to July 2026
Register now for our upcoming private, public and financial remedies webinars, taking place between January and July 2026. Read more >





