Philip Newman represented the applicant.

Summary: Where a defendant had filed an acknowledgement of service but had not disputed the court’s jurisdiction within 14 days after filing it, as required by CPR r.11(4), he was not entitled to extra time to serve notice to dispute jurisdiction even though the claimant’s claim form had been served on the defendant outside the jurisdiction after the six-month period required for service. Rule 11(5) had been engaged and the defendant was treated as having accepted the court’s jurisdiction. Link: Case Analysis (pdf)


10th Jul 2014

42BR Family Law Webinar Series - September to December 2026

We are delighted to continue our 2026 Family Law Webinar Series with a further five sessions that will explore a range of family law topics through to the end of the year - register now! Read more >

42BR Complex Possession Claims Webinar Series - September to December

Register now for our September to December housing webinar series covering topics relating to complex possessions claims. Read more >

GET IN TOUCH

 

 

Social media:

    

Awards & Recognition











Developed by Algarve.PRO