We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.
By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.
By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
This training will cover a short, easy to digest introduction to statutory nuisance prosecutions in respect of residential accommodation Read more >
The significance of a recent High Court housing law case cannot be underestimated – both legally and practically – in bringing to the fore the practical effects of local authority allocation schemes, writes Martin Khoshdel. Read more >
Social media:
Philip Newman represented the applicant.
Summary: Where a defendant had filed an acknowledgement of service but had not disputed the court’s jurisdiction within 14 days after filing it, as required by CPR r.11(4), he was not entitled to extra time to serve notice to dispute jurisdiction even though the claimant’s claim form had been served on the defendant outside the jurisdiction after the six-month period required for service. Rule 11(5) had been engaged and the defendant was treated as having accepted the court’s jurisdiction. Link: Case Analysis (pdf)
10.07.2014
