![Re E (Children: Costs) [EWCA] Civ 183](https://www.42br.com/_files/article/803/984-sam-davis-case-note.png)
Re E (Children: Costs) [EWCA] Civ 183
Samuel Davis is successful before the Court of Appeal in Re E (Children: Costs) [EWCA] Civ 183. This significant decision deals with the applicable cost principles following a fact-finding hearing in family proceedings.
In Re E (Children: Costs) the Court of Appeal has allowed (in part) the Father’s appeal against a ‘no order as to costs’ decision following a fact-finding hearing where ‘extreme allegations’ that ‘completely transformed the proceedings’ were made.
The appeal raised questions about the correct approach in private law proceedings to fact-finding cost decisions, and raised issues (which were not determined in this appeal) about the possibility of cost recovery against the Lord Chancellor when one party is legally aided for a fact-finding hearing.
Significantly the Court of Appeal has confirmed:
- That costs orders can be made in children proceedings in exceptional circumstances, including where the behaviour of one party has been unreasonable or reprehensible.
- That there should be no distinction, for cost purposes, between public and private law proceedings.
- That the previous approach of ‘ring-fencing’ fact-finding hearings for cost purposes (as set out in Re J (Costs of Fact-Finding Hearing) [2009] EWCA Civ 1350, [2010] 1 FLR 1893) has not survived the Supreme Court decision of Re T (Children) (Costs: Care Proceedings: Serious Allegation Not Proved) [2012] UKSC 36 in relation to private law proceedings.
- That the decision in A Mother v A Father [2023] EWFC 105(B) so far as it related to costs was wrong.
- That there is no basis for penalising a party in costs that fails to prove an allegation of rape.
- That the belief of a party is not a defence to a costs application where there has been unreasonable behaviour.
- That extreme allegations that transform proceedings can lead to a cost order, particularly when combined with other forms of unreasonable behaviour.
Re E (Children: Costs) [EWCA] Civ 183 judgment
Samuel Davis acted for the successful appellant father.
3rd Mar 2025

42BR Barristers - Headline Sponsor of the Family Law Awards 2025
42BR Barristers is delighted to once again be the Headline Sponsor of the Family Law Awards Read more >

Family Law Webinar Series - January to July 2025
Register now for our upcoming private, public and financial remedies webinars, taking place between January and July 2025. Read more >