
Reassessing Proportionality: Implied Limitations and Judicial Review under Section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981 by Arfan Khan
42BR's Arfan Khan has written an article, published by Oxford Academic Statute Law Review, titled 'Reassessing Proportionality: Implied Limitations and Judicial Review under Section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981'.
There exists a lively debate regarding whether proportionality outside of the European Convention on Human Rights is an independent ground for judicial review or overlaps with the Wednesbury Unreasonableness or irrationality ground and is indistinguishable from it.1 This Article contends that proportionality, as a fair balance test, is an implied limitation to a statutory power and, therefore, constitutes an independent test within section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981 (BNA 1981). Consequently, if a decision is disproportionate, it is amenable to judicial review on the existing ground of illegality. In that case, it is not necessary to consider an independent Wednesbury unreasonableness or irrationality test.
Read the full article here.
1st May 2024

Family Law Webinars - January to July 2026
Register now for our upcoming private, public and financial remedies webinars, taking place between January and July 2026. Read more >

ADHD in the workplace: lessons for employers following tribunal
Catherine Urquhart discusses the case Khorram v Capgemini UK plc, 2025 – the Respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments to help the Claimant, who had ADHD. Read more >






