We use cookies to offer you a better experience and analyse site traffic.

By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.



I agree


Reassessing Proportionality: Implied Limitations and Judicial Review under Section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981 by Arfan Khan

Reassessing Proportionality: Implied Limitations and Judicial Review under Section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981 by Arfan Khan

42BR's Arfan Khan has written an article, published by Oxford Academic Statute Law Review, titled 'Reassessing Proportionality: Implied Limitations and Judicial Review under Section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981'.

There exists a lively debate regarding whether proportionality outside of the European Convention on Human Rights is an independent ground for judicial review or overlaps with the Wednesbury Unreasonableness or irrationality ground and is indistinguishable from it.1 This Article contends that proportionality, as a fair balance test, is an implied limitation to a statutory power and, therefore, constitutes an independent test within section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981 (BNA 1981). Consequently, if a decision is disproportionate, it is amenable to judicial review on the existing ground of illegality. In that case, it is not necessary to consider an independent Wednesbury unreasonableness or irrationality test.

Read the full article here.

 


1st May 2024

Arfan Khan

Call 2001

Arfan Khan

Family Law Webinar Series - January to July 2025

Register now for our upcoming private, public and financial remedies webinars, taking place between January and July 2025. Read more >

Employment Webinar Series - January to April 2025

Register now for our Employment Law Webinars, running from January to April 2025. Read more >

GET IN TOUCH

 

 

Social media:

    

Awards & Recognition











Developed by CodeShore.Ltd